Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 6341 - 6360 of 14,933
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
 Because this case was brought in a United States District Court in Connecticut. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:53 am by Scott Bomboy
Attorneys for a Georgia woman who claims she lost her hospital job because of her sexual orientation have filed suit with the United States Supreme Court, setting up another potential landmark case about discrimination. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 5:55 am by Michelle Buhalo
Woodward all worked their way up to Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (122 Pennsylvania Manual 94).The directory also includes names of lawyers who served in public office. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:02 am by Mario Machado
On September 8, 1974, President Gerald Ford granted a presidential pardon to Nixon: For all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fisher, and DeWine No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice O’Neill Full Disclosure Professor Emerita Bettman has been retained as a paid appellate consultant for Capital Care in the Supreme Court of Ohio appeal. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:52 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Last week, I wrote about the statue of Chief Justice John Marshall. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” The chief justice designated nine justices to decide the Privacy Case. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:29 am by Scott Bomboy
” Scott Bomboy is editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:30 am by Matthew Waxman
But when Hughes uttered those words that day, he was not writing as Chief Justice (he served from 1930-1941) or as Associate Justice (he served 1910-1916). [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
The United States of America has a “consent decree,” and always has. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
But rehearing would be required in any event because the bias injected into the proceedings by Justice Hearn tainted not only her conclusions, but those of Acting Justice Pleicones and of Chief Justice Beatty, as well.In a nutshell, the fault exposed by the petition for rehearing is this: there is no 3-2 majority, or any majority, of the Court that is united in favor of any reasoning for any result that is dispositive of the entire case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
But rehearing would be required in any event because the bias injected into the proceedings by Justice Hearn tainted not only her conclusions, but those of Acting Justice Pleicones and of Chief Justice Beatty, as well.In a nutshell, the fault exposed by the petition for rehearing is this: there is no 3-2 majority, or any majority, of the Court that is united in favor of any reasoning for any result that is dispositive of the entire case. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
George Hearn stated that the role of women in the church was an issue to him in leaving St. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm by Emmah Wabuke
(The United States has set a precedent in this regard.) [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 7:38 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]