Search for: "State of New York v. United States" Results 6341 - 6360 of 16,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
Schneiderman (January 10; granted September 29): A First Amendment challenge to a New York law that allows merchants to give “discounts” to customers who pay in cash, but criminalizes the imposition of “surcharges” for customers who use credit cards. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
United States (the anti-commandeering doctrine) and NFIB v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 9:51 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff-Appellant BT Holdings, LLC appealed from the order and opinion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which granted Defendants-Appellees Village of Chester and Village of Chester Board of Trustees’s motion to dismiss BT Holdings’s regulatory takings claim as unripe. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There were news stories about the case in Biz Asia, Daily Pakistan and on the 5RB website. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:30 am by EEM
Asylum Policy," Law and Politics Book Review, vol. 26, no. 7 (Nov. 2016) [text]Latin-America and Refugees: A Panoramic View (Völkerrechtsblog, Nov. 2016) [text]Refugees at Our Backyard: Current US Refugee Policy and the Flight of Central Americans to the United States (Völkerrechtsblog, Nov. 2016) [text]"Should We Presume State Protection? [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
At the New York Times Room for Debate, the question was posed whether cities has “a right” to “defy Trump. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  There is a plausible argument against this power that might, however, be of some utility to the sanctuary cities: The Supreme Court has said (in New York v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
His passing meant that I had to find a different way to address Citizens United in the book. [read post]