Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 6341 - 6360 of 8,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
The panel concluded that Board members are inferior officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause; and thus properly appointed by the SEC. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  Some may find irony in the CPR’s past criticism of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica)   New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)   Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP)   Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak)   Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46)   Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
Washington affirmed that state laws penalizing or replacing faithless electors are constitutional. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 11:36 am
The one False Claims case Bexis ever was involved in, United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The committee’s survey had an extensive sampling—34 of the 51 jurisdictions (the 50 states plus Washington, D.C.). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
  The Foundry also weighs in, focusing on Thomas’ remarks on the State of the Union speech. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
The plans, called Medicare Advantage, are run through private health insurers as an alternative to traditional fee-for-service Medicare plans.Medicare Billing Fraud: DRUG SUPPLIER CAN'T BE LIABLE FOR KEEPING OVERPAYMENTS, COURT RULES, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  The rationale behind this bill should be obvious, especially in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]