Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 6341 - 6360 of 97,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 1:23 pm by Christine Hurt
  Well, apparently this is not enough for George Lucas. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
An employee organization's duty of fair representationAgosto v Correctional Services Benevolent Association, USDC SDNY, 107 F.Supp.2d 294Blaca Agosto, a New York City corrections officer, filed a complaint with the deputy warden of the facility alleging that another guard had shown her sexually explicit photographs of another female corrections officer and then asked her to pose with him as well. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:36 am
In an end-of-term decision handed down in June, the Supreme Court in Ricci v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Oral arguments in the AI-inventorship case of Thaler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm by Bruce Boyden
The Viacom court largely saved that issue for another day, and the revised UMG opinion preserves the issue for later as well. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Given the costs and difficulties of producing alternative APIs with similar appeal to programmers, allowing enforcement here would make of the Sun Java API’s declaring code a lock limiting the future creativity of new programs.Google v Oracle Majority Opinion As a result, the court found that the fourth (as well as all other factors) favored Google and that Google’s copying was a fair use as a matter of law. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
I think the ruling is so well-constructed and well-cited that it will be easy for the Ninth Circuit to affirm it, just as they did with the Sikhs for Justice ruling. [read post]