Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 29,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff’s motion was not premature (see CPLR 3212[f]). [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:44 am
White, non-Hispanic defendants accounted for 24 percent of the total felony arrests last year. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:09 am
Lyonnais, 106 F. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:19 am
F). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:17 pm
11 Dec 2018, 11:08 am
" (Sec. 2(f)). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Armco Steel Corp., 559 F.2d 250 (CA5 1977), which involved three parties having a common-legal interest in defending a conspiracy charge. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Armco Steel Corp., 559 F.2d 250 (CA5 1977), which involved three parties having a common-legal interest in defending a conspiracy charge. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
Here is my submission to the INDU Committee conducting the s.92 review of the Copyright Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:18 am
…[I]f truly offered for impeachment, only those portions of the Johnsons’ testimony that showed inconsistencies in the witness trial testimony should have been offered. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:10 pm
F. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
Masterson, 529 F.2d 30, 32 (9th Cir. 1976) (noting that “[i]n both Holley and Telfaire a single eyewitness was the only incriminating evidence against the defendant”). [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:27 pm
In order to establish standing, the Opposer must show that it has a legitimate interest in the outcome of the proceeding and that it will be damaged should the defendant’s application issue. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:23 pm
… [I]f they’re not doing restitution, how could that be the basis of disgorgement? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
" (Sec. 2(f)). [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
A few of the specific requirements that all applicants that are not a governmental or higher education entity must provide include:The name and address, and when applicable, the license number of each dentist, dental hygienist, laboratory technician, and dental assistant associated with the facility or unit for which a permit is sought;A copy of a written agreement for the emergency follow-up care for patients treated in the mobile dental facility, or through a portable dental unit, and such… [read post]
