Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 61,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
Quon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
There's no sign that the issue's going away, and the result shouldn't vary simply depending upon which panel the defendant happens to draw.Which generally means that the California Supreme Court should grant review. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Because I'm not a moron, and have also been an attorney for a quarter century now, and even I can't fully follow the Ninth Circuit's explanation today as to what it means (or what we have to tell a jury) when we say that someone who ships firearms from one state to another may be acting in "willful"violation of the law.If even someone like me can't fully understand what we're saying, how in God's Green Earth can we expect a jury of… [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:38 pm
But in our system of government that means respecting the laws passed by Congress, not bending them—including our nation’s immigration laws. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:01 pm
Big, fat reading.Meanwhile, on the California state side, the only thing published we have is this one. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
In California, that wouldn't mean much as a practical matter. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Which means it took six years to get decided. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:05 pm
Because the case is down here in San Diego, and it means that the case will either have to be settled or will go to trial. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:15 am
See Shankle v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
The recent case of United States of America vs. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:02 am
First Interstate Bank (Official Tribal Government)Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:02 am
At issue in Barenboim v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:56 am
National Australian Bank Ltd., [1] the Second Circuit’s significant decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Second, after United States v. [read post]
