Search for: "46 & 7, Inc." Results 621 - 640 of 1,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 9:05 am by Monika Kuschewsky
This is the first time that the Court has been asked to interpret the European Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (the ‘Directive’) in the context of internet search engines. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
District Court opinions followed, two of which read General Security broadly as precluding coverage for, and any duty to defend arising from, property damage to the insured’s previously performed work arising from construction defects.14 Both of these cases, Greystone Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The regulatory approach to such compounds can be based on the identification of a No-Observed Effect Level (NOEL) and use of uncertainty factors (see ICH Q3C(R5), Ref. 7) to calculate a permissible daily exposure (PDE) when data are available. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
Id. at 2. [7] Urska Velikonja, Behind the Annual SEC Enforcement Report: 2017 and Beyond 1 (November 19, 2017), available here. [8] Id. at 2, 4-6. [9] Id. at 5, n. 6. [10] See id. at 5, n. 7. [11] See id. at 4. [12] S.E.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
Id. at 2. [7] Urska Velikonja, Behind the Annual SEC Enforcement Report: 2017 and Beyond 1 (November 19, 2017), available here. [8] Id. at 2, 4-6. [9] Id. at 5, n. 6. [10] See id. at 5, n. 7. [11] See id. at 4. [12] S.E.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
Accufix Research Inst., Inc., 253 F.3d 1180, 1195-96, amended, 273 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2001); Barnes, 161 F.3d at 143-46; Boughton v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Supp.2d 430, 443-46 (E.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:00 pm by Margot Beauchemin-Daoust
L’autrice désire remercier Clara Larocque, stagiaire en droit, pour son aide dans la rédaction de cet article. [1] Gasse c Secours mécanique industrielle inc., 2024 QCTAT 169. [2] RLRQ, c N-1.1, r.0.1. [3] RLRQ, c N-1.1. [4] Gasse c Secours mécanique industrielle inc., 2024 QCTAT 169 au para 23. [5] Ibid au para 40. [6] Ibid au para 41. [7] Ibid au para 44. [8] Ibid au para 46. [9] Ibid au para 47. [10] Il importe également… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
They argued that because their form of offering was not specifically enumerated by statute, it did not need to be registered.[7] Sound familiar? [read post]