Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2009, 4:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice
FIRST DEPARTMENTEmployment
Disability Discrimination Suit's Dismissal Reversed; Claims Stated Under State, City Human Rights Laws
Vig v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:17 am
In Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:52 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (PA State Police). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Gold, The Demise of Roe v Wade Undermines Freedom of Religion, (ACS Blogs, Expert Forum, August 2022).Joshua Schroeder, Rethinking Rights in a Disappearing Penumbra: How to Expand Upon Reproductive Rights in Court After Dobbs, (54 N.M. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
While claims for confidentiality generally fail once the information has passed into the public domain (see Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109), the law provides greater protection to privacy rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
In April 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court, in Varnum v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:02 am
Final administrative determination for the purposes of determining the statute of limitationsSkiptunas v State of New York, App. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
Under Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
McFarlane P cited the majority decision of the Supreme Court in PJS v News Group Newspapers Limited ([2016] AC 1081) to demonstrate how the importance of other rights flowing from ECHR can lead to a confidentiality injunction being maintained notwithstanding apparent widespread knowledge of sensitive material (at [59]). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of Cazzari v DiNapoli [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am
Particularly, the agreement between GW and Otsuka stated that it was governed by New York Law. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 1:00 am
In the case of Riad v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to… [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Sissel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
Michelle was a resident and citizen of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
