Search for: "Bishop v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 5:04 pm
From Kratovil v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm
Standard Life Assurance Co. (1995), 15 C.C.E.L. (2d) 71 (N.B.C.A.); Bishop v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
This distinction has remained because it is deemed necessary to safeguard the protection given to marriage in Article 41(3) of the Irish Constitution (right), which states in part:The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack.The constitutional text does not, however, make any reference to marriage as being exclusively open to different sex couples. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
So too in The Bishop of Bath’s Case (1605) 6 Co Rep 34b, 35b, Coke stated that a letting expressed to last until a certain amount of money had been “levied of the issues and profits … is but a lease at will without livery” – i.e. without the formalities required for the establishment of a freehold interest.26. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
So too in The Bishop of Bath’s Case (1605) 6 Co Rep 34b, 35b, Coke stated that a letting expressed to last until a certain amount of money had been “levied of the issues and profits … is but a lease at will without livery” – i.e. without the formalities required for the establishment of a freehold interest.26. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
William Bishop v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Augustine, » Saint, Bishop of Hippo » Influence. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
In Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 379, the primary question at issue was the meaning and effect of s.42, and in particular whether, where proceedings were brought without leave, it operated as a jurisdictional bar or merely as a procedural one. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm
City of Los Angeles etc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
In 2001, defendant as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the “Holy Office,” formerly known as the “Office of the Inquisition” issued a letter to all bishops of the Catholic Church concerning some “very grave sins” and the secret manner in which they were to be covered up….15. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm
” The bishop of the diocese of Superior controls Catholic Charities. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:08 pm
See State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
”A series of serious crimes widely described as “heinous” occurred in 1993 during the administration of President Fidel V. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
The state of these continuing congregations – often by their own admission – can be described as at best poorly prepared to maintain and operate large church properties, or at worst, teetering on the edge of being non-viable. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
Recently, the Franchise Law Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar issued this e-Bulletin discussing the Court of Appeal’s recent opinion in Verdugo v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:01 am
Recently, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals - in US v. [read post]
