Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
McGirt v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm
In Estelle v Smith (451 US 454 [1981]) the United States Supreme Court considered when the questioning by a person who is not a law enforcement officer is subject to the requirements of Miranda. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
United States (05-1272). [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
In the case of Avsar v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
In 2017, even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
United States, 07 Civ. 3727 (SHS), 2007 WL 4105813 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Legal Reasoning (Per Curiam)AnalysisCause of DelayPatentee SCR Pharmatop filed its initial patent appli- cation in France on June 6, 2000 and, in conformity with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), filed an interna- tional patent application identifying the United States, among others, as a designated state on June 6, 2001. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:01 pm
United States confirms (once again) that Justices Scalia and Thomas are not simply conservatives. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:14 am
Friends of the Everglades v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 am
United States, No. 10-1062 (cert. granted June 28, 2011). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:45 am
Thanks to my old colleague Frank for passing this to me:Some Excerpts from United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am
Turning to the Enterprise Act, s.22(1) states that the CMA must refer arrangements or transactions where “(a) a relevant merger situation has been created; and (b) the creation of that situation has resulted, or may be expected to result, in a substantial lessening of competition within any market or markets in the United Kingdom for goods or services. [read post]
