Search for: "Harris v. Department of State" Results 621 - 640 of 1,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm by Laurence Hooper
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which ruled in Cabral v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali consented.In April 2009, Detective Delbusso, the contact person for internet crimes at the Howard County Police Department, executed a search of Ms. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
Harris County, fine place though it is, hasn’t always been blessed with the most ethical of law enforcement. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:28 am by Adam M. Hamel
  On the covers of their briefs, the groups listed the title of the case as “Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This provision makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]