Search for: "In re Hatch"
Results 621 - 640
of 916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
Not so much because we're cutting edge, but as we're Plan B and Plan A just failed. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
Citing the court’s three-factor stay standard articulated in In re Brimonidine Patent Litig., No. 07-md-1866 (D. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
You’re welcome. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
And while we’re at it, comments to NIST from intellectual-property experts (here and here) and additional comments from Alden (here). [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:41 am
Finally, to the extent that Hatch Waxman was supposed to promote the availability of generic drugs, banning them outright is the antithesis of that purpose. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:32 am
Last summer, we published a comprehensive look at the ways that Facebook could and should open up its data so that users could control their experience on the service, and to make it easier for competing services to thrive. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
“Few things have a more tonic effect than a President’s sensitivities to public needs and hopes than the desire for re-election. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:12 pm
Re-Friending Israel Late last month, Israel and Turkey managed to normalize relations after a six-year hiatus sparked by the attack on the Mavi Marmara in June 2010. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
After the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2016, Facebook battened down the hatches on the Graph API — which advertisers used to access and exploit people’s sociopolitical information. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
Kennedy) (amendment offered by Senators Hatch and Kennedy, and unanimously agreed to by the Senate, to change “burden” to “substantially burden,” “is intended to make it clear that the pre-Smith law is applied under the RFRA in determining whether” a governmental burden on religion “must meet the [compelling interest] test”). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:42 am
We're available tomorrow. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
DDLaw, Closing The Arguments On Conte(1/22/2009) (citations and quotation marks omitted).Second, divorcing liability from manufacture creates open-ended and unpredictable liability that uniquely penalizes innovative drug manufacturers, and raises the price of all drugs, not just the one involved in litigation:Under Hatch-Waxman, a manufacturer of a pioneer drug has only the seventeen-year life of its patent to recoup its research expenses for that drug, and to make a… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Now they’re expanding it. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:15 am
Once fertilized, the eggs hatch into free-swimming larvae. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:34 am
They're categories of discussion. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:30 am
In the back of my mind I had already started hatching a plan although I don’t think I knew it in the winter of 2010. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
We're asking the Supreme Court to step in. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
Vladeck: They’re like cockroaches. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Bargaining failure results from three asymmetries: asymmetric stakes (most important factor in patents: pharma and generics—pure bargaining failure; not much failure to bargain, because notice is super clear and early bargaining is easy—under Hatch-Waxman); asymmetric information (law & econ people think this is where most of the action is in terms of causes of litigation: asymmetric knowledge of info relevant to validity, value, design-around cost); asymmetric… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
Barr was a Hatch-Waxman matter, with Alcon losing on infringement, but surviving as to validity. [read post]
