Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 621 - 640 of 15,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2014, 9:44 am by Diane Marie Amann
(Cross-posted from Diane Marie Amann)Filed under: History of International Law Tagged: International Humanitarian Law [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 11:12 pm
At the interstection of Tort and Estate, you may find Lodge v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in At the Cross Fellowship Baptist Church Inc v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Alexander Tsesis (Loyola University Chicago School of Law) has posted Burning Crosses on Campus: University Hate Speech Codes (Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, December 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The Claimant cross appealed on “the fact of the relationship”, contending that publication of this should be restrained until trial or the determination of the factual disputes between the parties. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff opposed the motion and cross-moved for relief on various grounds. [read post]
She appealed but the Court of Appeal, again on the basis that the general rule applied, dismissed her appeal and allowed the police cross appeal against the findings that the arresting officers were negligent. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:34 pm
Berman, a professor at Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University and proprietor of the blog Sentencing Law and Policy, where this entry is cross-posted. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 11:39 am by WSLL
CROSS, husband and wife, Proposed Road No. 276: WAYNE CURTIS ALTAFFER v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:22 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Below is today's Contract law Appellate Court opinion:   AC31413 - Shelton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:23 am by Tom Smith
In any event, every good law school student knows that in contract law, there’s no agreement until the parties have settled on the terms. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]