Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 621 - 640
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2008, 5:33 am
HuffstetlerOn January 22, 2008, in Allen v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Rev. 481, 481 (2005), stating that the issue has been labeled an "Armageddon" by some and a "salvation" by others. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:43 pm
Equity Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:41 am
That is what led to yesterday's decision in Allen v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 1:53 am
However, this approach began to change after such landmark rulings as Zubulake v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
State (Judge Najam writing) and Sanders v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
[3] Complaint at 29-30, New York v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
See also Flood v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
They relied on Ryan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 5:28 am
Acquisition Partners LP v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Employment Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Suit Dismissed; Disclosures Insufficiently Related to Shareholder Fraud Portes v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 5:27 am
The Second Circuit reversed, holding that even though plaintiffs had filed their individual lawsuits prior to the district court’s ruling on class certification, their claims were tolled under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:30 am
Two developments, the passage by the House of Representatives of the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007 and the announcement that Senator Kennedy has filed the Equal Remedies Act are just more indications that the battle ground for employers is about to shift to the legislative front.Except for the whistleblower provisions of Sarbanes Oxley, you have to go back almost fifteen years (the passage of the FMLA in 1993) for any significant federal employment legislation.The Lily Ledbetter Act… [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
Nothing in her remarks evidenced any sympathy with shareholders and their substantive rights under state law.The irony in the positions taken by Casey and Atkins is that the access proposal in fact permits private ordering and respects state law. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
V&E Raises Associate Salaries in Texas and D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:16 am
In the United States Supreme Court of Haddle v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
On Monday we will resume with a discussion of the recent decision arisng out of the Enron collapse, Regents v. [read post]
