Search for: "People v Person"
Results 621 - 640
of 31,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
Because we want a neutral magistrate to decide -- except in the most extreme cases -- whether circumstances truly warrant (pun intended) making people no longer "secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:57 pm
Though bad, I suspect, for the next person that Deputy Sheriff Ferreira (or anyone else in his department) spots blowing past a school bus with its lights on. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
The person driving the van eventually strikes a deal with prosecutors and testifies against the guy. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:53 am
Through the give and take of deliberations, however, the jury‘s collective memory and common sense will often correct these types of errors and lead to a result that surpasses in wisdom the understanding of any one person. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
As it is today.In an opinion that's lots and lots of fancy analysis for something that a regular old person might well think is silly. [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
Defendant had been given various diagnoses, including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, schizophrenia, a psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, antisocial personality disorder, and polysubstance abuse. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
And in those opinions, the Court of Appeal not only expressly mentions Fallon Flores' name, and not only expressly mention the name of the victim (Fernando Renteria), but also give a fair piece of detail about that victim (calling him "a small-time drug user and distributor in the Moreno Valley area of Riverside County").It wouldn't bother me if we called every crime victim a Doe (though I think that using their actual names somewhat personalizes the crime and… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
Usually the justices just say "conspired to murder" that person. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 2:29 pm
As a result, figuring out which particular group of justices you personally agree with is potentially a challenge, but an important one. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:47 pm
Aynes (The University of Akron School of Law) has posted McDonald V. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:30 pm
The Fourth Amendment protects “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
It is tempting to think of the plaintiffs in Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:16 am
The government has vast powers to gather personal information and maintains extensive dossiers of people’s data, and this information can be very sensitive, critical to people’s reputations and well-being, and the leaking of it can result in serious harm. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm
Collins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Michael Stevens at the Kentucky Law Review does a great round up of posts and materials on Medicaid subrogation in light of Alhorn v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:40 am
Additional Resources: Manfre v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:07 pm
It seems like every year after the annual Florida v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
In introducing his discussion of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Judge Easterbrook wrote:This leaves the statute, which often goes by the unpronounceable initialism RLUIPA but which we call "the Act" so that the opinion can be understood by normal people. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:19 pm
This issue was addressed by the Texas Supreme Court in Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
I bet that if he was released, and then ended up as a mass shooter, a ton of people would say: "It was so obvious! [read post]
