Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 621 - 640 of 5,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2007, 3:54 am
But these are, at least in my view, substantially harder arguments to make than they would be if the Second Amendment simply said "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
 What got me through land law as a student was Gray and Symes’ textbook, Real Property and Real People. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am by Andres
The European Court of Justice has finally ruled on the landmark case of L’Oréal v eBay (C-324/09) . [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
As Gedicks writes in the op-ed: The First Amendment’s establishment clause prevents the government from requiring people to bear the burden of religions to which they do not belong and whose teachings they do not practice. [read post]
The Second Amendment states that “[a] well-regulated milita, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am by SHG
  Via KOMO News: The Second Amendment gives every law abiding American the right to bear firearms, but the two don’t coexist very well when it comes to marijuana. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:37 am
It's much easier to justify imposing a disadvantage on the people you decided could bear the burden. [read post]