Search for: "People v. Ing"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
And of course in Bluman v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:35 am
To begin with, Connecticut law lets judges issue orders to protect victims of “stalking,” defined as: (a) … knowingly engag[ing] in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for such person’s physical safety or the physical safety of a third person; or … (b) … intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engag[ing] in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
Given that 658 people did not reach a settlement but were apparently left untroubled, Virgin Media argued that this was evidence that the Applicants in the present case were simply interested in setting up a money-making scheme, not suing anyone or seeking genuine redress. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
That was the focus of the (somewhat) recent case of Kernal Records Oy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
” State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
The decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Few people feel that way today. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Riva v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:55 pm
Williams v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
Even if government were permitted to conjure an interest in support of the present prohibition on beer label speech, that prohibition would only be "another case of 'burn[ing] the house to roast the pig.'" Sable Commc's of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Nor was Pamela Stark's post constitutionally unprotected on the theory that it was "harass[ing]. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:54 am
Robin Singh Educational Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Smalley, No. 06-4552 A sentence for bank robbery is vacated and remanded for resentencing where: 1) the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement for "otherwise us[ing]" a dangerous weapon during the course of a bank robbery, as opposed to a three-level enhancement for "brandish[ing] or possess[ing]" a dangerous weapon; and 2) the error was not harmless despite the district court's attempt to amend its judgment after the sentencing… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
With today’s SCOTUS decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Why § 230 Likely Doesn't Provide Immunity for Libels Composed by ChatGPT, Bard, etc.
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
Accusearch Inc., 570 F.3d 1187, 1200 (10th Cir. 2009); People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm
While there have been some hints that the era might be coming to an end (for example, US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am
Supreme Court session, which begins October 2, could be a critical one for LGBT people. [read post]
