Search for: "SUMMERS v. POWERS"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Perhaps his change of heart really arose from a sudden new understanding of congressional taxing power (248). There seems to be no good answer. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
The case of Gee v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
This post includes significant developments over the previous few weeks, since our Law and Media Summer Round Up. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:56 pm
On the one hand, the Supreme Court has adopted quite limited remedies in its own removal power decisions (such as Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:27 am
In Beck v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
It prevented Parliament from carrying out its constitutional role for five out of the possible eight weeks between the end of the summer recess and exit day on 31 October. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
“To make us a pawn in personal power-plays and agendas is shameful and nothing short of illegal. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:51 am
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
The appellants had relied upon the view of May J in Summers v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames [2018] EWHC 782 (Admin), [2018] 1 WLR 4729, at [24], that the expression “those in the locality” in section 59 of the 2014 Act “must be read to include those who regularly visit or work in the locality, in addition to residents”. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
In one well-known example, DeFunis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:29 am
Eva-Maria Herring (who in the Qualcomm v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
’” That 1952 case, Ray v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
In Monroe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:45 am
Robert Caro famously wrote that “if you really want to show power in its larger aspects, you need to show the effects on the powerless, for good or ill. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Supreme CourtIn Allen v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:18 pm
Because of Congress’s power under the Supremacy Clause to direct how federal statutes are to be applied, state courts hearing 1933 Act cases must conform to the federal scheme provided by the PSLRA and SLUSA, which granted those very courts jurisdiction to hear 1933 Act claims in the first place. [read post]
