Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 1,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
Weltover, a breaching party’s failure to make contractually required payments in the United States causes a “direct effect” in the United States triggering the commercial activity exception where the parties’ expectations and course of dealing have established the United States as the place of payment, or only where payment in the United States is unconditionally required by contract. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
  In response, Rock River sued Universal alleging that it violated Sections 2 and 7 of the Sherman Act by (1) attempting to monopolize the reggae genre of sound records in the United States; and (2) restraining trade and threatening to create a monopoly. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:36 am by Barry Barnett
Circuit to reject what it (C&D) deemed an extreme reading of Sherman Act section 2 -- the Third Circuit's en banc decision in LePage's Inc. v. 3M, 324 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2003) (en banc). [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 12:41 am by Florian Mueller
United States Senators from both sides of the aisle have responded to the decision by stating their resolve to take action. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
A Sherman I claim or a series of claims, would have been aided, arguably, by the concept of “quantitative substantiality”, as recognized in the venerable 1949 Standard Stations case, and more recently in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple App Store antitrust case, Epic Games filed its opening brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit yesterday. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]