Search for: "State v. Kelly "
Results 621 - 640
of 1,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 2:16 pm
Kelly, 401 A.2d 799 (Pa.S. 1979) Thompson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
John Kelly as Secretary of Homeland Security and General (ret.) [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
In an ;essay for the Regulatory Review’s annual Supreme Court series, Katie Eyer argues that the result in Bostock v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Also, in Matter of Garnes v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30262(U); affirmed 51 AD3d 538, the court concluded that a probationary period is extended as the result 0f the employee's disciplinary suspension from his position for off duty misconduct. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Also, in Matter of Garnes v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30262(U); affirmed 51 AD3d 538, the court concluded that a probationary period is extended as the result 0f the employee's disciplinary suspension from his position for off duty misconduct. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In particular he stated that 'there was no suggestion from either party that the Shanks patents were crucial to Unilever’s success. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
"*As to the penalty imposed, dismissal, the court, quoting from Kelly, 96 NY2d at 38, concluded that the penalty of termination is not shocking to one's sense of fairness noting that "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law . . . [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 1:50 pm
See Randall v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
By Kelly McClure In Waldrop v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:41 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:38 am
The first case is State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
See Baxter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:38 pm
An often cited case on this argument, Kelly v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Recognizing how narrowly the order defines sanctuary jurisdictions is helpful in avoiding unnecessary rabbit holes, like the recurring suggestion that, for purposes of fighting Trump’s executive order, the § 1983 Third Circuit case Galarza v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:12 am
By Kelly McClure In Ochsner v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:12 am
By Kelly McClure In Ochsner v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
The speakers were Kelly Bennett and Thom Clark from the Legal Department. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
” In an op-ed at Fox News, Kelly Shackelford observes that the new term offers the court “ample opportunity to continue its recent trend of returning to the Constitution’s original text and meaning regarding religious liberty. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:55 am
It's Cooper v. [read post]
