Search for: "State v. Money" Results 621 - 640 of 20,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Had the state just banned condoms or the pill, it's hard to imagine a different outcome.Maybe a harder case would be presented if the state offered a health justification for the ban. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Revealing Money in Politics after Citizens United and Doe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The proceedings were stayed largely because Mr Gohil charged with serious money-laundering and convicted and sentenced to prison in 2011, but finally in Sep 2012 Moylan J decided to set aside the order on the basis that there had been material non-disclosure, if Mr Gohil had made full disclosure the outcome would have been different, and because Mrs Gohil had satisfied the evidence criteria is Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
James Weinstein (Arizona State) and I filed an amicus brief last week in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:38 pm
Pataki (2006), which found a state “cannot leverage its money to affect” employer activity “beyond [its] dealings with the State. [read post]