Search for: "State v. Urban"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2013, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
WASHINGTON, D.C. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
The court’s entire decision can be found at Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:17 pm
See, Evins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Urban Development Corporation) again addressed claims by property owners alleging that the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) had not been adequately followed and that the project does not involve an appropriate public project within the meaning of the various governing statutes including the Eminent Domain Procedures Law. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Urban Development Corporation) again addressed claims by property owners alleging that the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) had not been adequately followed and that the project does not involve an appropriate public project within the meaning of the various governing statutes including the Eminent Domain Procedures Law. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:34 pm
", Fish observes, "Whatever side of the Second Amendment controversy you may be on, the clear winner in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Van Gilder v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:44 pm
Shande v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:14 pm
., urban, agricultural, and forestry wastes and residues). [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm
Puyallup Tribe of Indians (employment termination)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Schaghticoke Indian Tribe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:13 am
Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:37 am
The First Department first noted that regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development required the Housing Authority to deny admission to a family whose member is subject to a lifetime registration requirement under any sex offender statute (24 CFR 960.204[a][4]). [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:07 am
Corp. (13 NY3d 511 [2009]) and Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:26 am
CCTV systems have become part of our lives and a routine landmark in urban public spaces. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm
The court’s decision in City Walk – Urban Mission Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
New York State Urban Development Corp., 892 N.Y.S.2d 8, 28 (N.Y. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:26 pm
And AB 2716, which specifically affects California’s largest urban oilfield, Los Angeles’ own Inglewood Oil Field—adjacent to which Governor Newsom signed the three bills this morning—will require the state oil and gas regulator, CalGEM, to identify all low-producing wells within the field by next March. [read post]
