Search for: "Steve Vladeck" Results 621 - 640 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Steve Vladeck analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
United States, centering on an appeal of a restitution award; Steve Vladeck previewed the case for this blog; Emily Rector and Kimberly Petrick do the same for Cornell. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck previews his testimony this morning before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
In the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Steve Vladeck “take a deep dive into two cases at the intersection of federal courts and foreign relations that are being argued during the November sitting: Jam v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:28 am by Austin Sarat
Never before has the pardon power been used because one president feared his successor’s authoritarian tendencies.Trump may find what Biden did particularly galling because, as Georgetown University Law Professor Steve Vladeck puts it, there is “no such a thing as an ‘un-pardon. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Steve Vladeck provides this blog’s analysis of the argument in Manrique v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  But, again, that wasn’t the question — just as it wasn’t the question for the Quirin court, as Steve Vladeck has pointed out (emphasis in original): The question, of course, is what Quirin meant by “offenses committed by enemy belligerents against the law of war. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 1:54 pm by Scott Bomboy
” Legal scholar Steve Vladeck wrote about several possible scenarios as the Khalil deportation case unfolds, once the government makes its case in federal court. [read post]
4 Jan 2025, 7:25 am by Stephen Griffin
 [Note: After patiently hearing me out on this topic since the election, Jack asked me to write this up. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm by Bridget Crawford
The abundance of tweets at the AALS Annual Meeting (#AALS2015) made me sit up and take notice of how many more law professors there seem to be on Twitter now compared to 2012 when I last updated the Census of Law Professor Twitter users (see Version 1.0 here and Version 2.0 here). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by Mark Walsh
(Marbury came up quite a bit during oral argument in the case, and Steve Vladeck, who argued for Ortiz and other petitioners, will no doubt remember that Kennedy asked him whether he thought Marbury was right.) [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Just Security, Steve Vladeck urges the court to grant review in two Guantanamo military commission cases, arguing that “the time has long-since passed for the Supreme Court to settle the validity of the commissions’ jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary comes from: Jeffrey Bellin, who at CNN writes that “Merrick Garland can help bring the Supreme Court together, pushing at least one of the three branches of government out of the political muck”; Ilya Shapiro, who at Forbes contends that the “Senate is fully within its rights, given the unique nature of this judicial vacancy, to fulfill its ‘advice and consent’ function by telling the president that we should let this fall’s election determine… [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:03 am by Weronika Galka
  [Editor’s note: For a detailed timeline of the litigation over whether the Justice Department can publicly release the January 6th report, see Steve Vladeck’s analysis this morning at Just Security.] [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue and Steve Vladeck report that the court’s broad reading of the exemption “came in a case concerning food stamps, in which a South Dakota newspaper had sought data from the Department of Agriculture on the number of stores participating in the federal food stamp program, and store-by-store data on the amount of purchases made using food stamps. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am by Tejinder Singh
Steve Vladeck has all the details. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices held 7-2 that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban, Steve Vladeck, counsel for the petitioners, writes for the Harvard Law Review Blog that the case &ldq [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that as the justices take the bench this morning for what is likely the last Monday of the term, “[s]ix opinions remain, including on the travel ban, public sector unions and redistricting, and one looming question that could change the future direction of the court: Will there be a retirement? [read post]