Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 7:08 am
Superior Court of San Mateo County (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 605, the court acknowledged that extensive evidentiary showing on a motion to strike made the motion a speaking motion which had to be treated and tested as if it were a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
As Justice Brown wrote, then of the Superior Court of Justice, in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:56 am
In O’Grady v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm
Heritage Residential Care, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:22 pm
The Court was aware of the need for caution and warns in its opinion: The Court has recognized, however, that too broad an interpretation of this exclusionary principle could eviscerate patent law. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:32 pm
He did, however, allow for delay damages on the jury’s award for future pain and suffering as that has previously been permitted by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Gross v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Brinkley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm
In the Kaiser v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”[14] On May 13, 2022, Judge Duffy-Lewis—also of the Los Angeles Superior Court—reached a similar conclusion in a second action also titled Crest v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 10:30 am
Superior Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:13 pm
Here, the California class is certified but the Pennsylvania class isn't, a stark reminder of how differently California courts treat material omissions in advertising: Beck-Ellman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
The Ninth Circuit found that the lower court had abused its discretion by "treat[ing] plaintiffs' actual legal theory as all but beside the point" and instead focusing its analysis on factual differences among the putative class which were admittedly individualized inquiries. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
On Wednesday the Supreme Court heard arguments in Hein v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:00 pm
Today the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts issued an opinion in Donovan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am
As an example of the Court mistakenly taking a cautious approach, he cites Bowers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
On September 8, 2010, the Superior Court judge granted the City's motion to dismiss and PLEA appealed. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:26 pm
The article analyzes the criminal court decision of Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
I could say, “I told you so,” but instead I’m going to lay out the reality leading to the Supreme Court draft overruling of Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
