Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 621 - 640
of 9,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
It is critical to conduct a trademark clearance search prior to filing any trademark application at the United States Patent & Trademark Office, including an application seeking registration for a mark that includes a surname. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:22 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:59 am
’s well-settled status in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Especially in the western United States, sprawling homeless encampments have become ubiquitous, to the disgust and dismay of local residents. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
D & P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Without the question mark, that's Alaska's state motto.With the question mark, it's our title for a post analyzing the on-going trial in State of Alaska v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
" United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Mark J. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
Case date: 22 July 2022 Case number: No. 21-2786 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
CA3: Police were objectively reasonable in entering a house they thought was abandoned but it wasn't
8 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889), also known as the Chinese Exclusion Case. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:00 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court in Sprint Communications Co LP v APCC Services Inc divided on the question whether an assignee for collection of federal debts satisfied Article III standing. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
