Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 621 - 640
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
Today marks the first of a possibly three-day, pre-trial motions hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:03 am
A little programming note here, y’all: today marks the first of a two-day, pre-trial hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
Today marks the first in a week-long hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:00 am
United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:40 am
This marks the third day of this week’s four-day motions session in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:38 am
" DuPont factors two and three: The Board improperly discounted the evidence that "COGNAC certified product has an intimate and legendary history with music, particularly rap music and hip-hop music, in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
On Monday, November 1, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
Clontech Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
The false marking statute includes a bounty hunter (i.e., qui tam) provision providing that “[a]ny person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
Since first filing their United States trademark opposition suit in 2015, Monster has continued their court battle against the Raptors for the last four years with no known... [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:33 pm
Madison United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:08 am
Both marks were used for apparel and related retail services (North 61 LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:50 am
Unites States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:18 pm
October 1st marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court term. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 3:07 am
But the government’s registration of a scandalous term as a trademark, which results in publication of that mark on the Principal Register and allows the registrant to use the mark with the ® symbol, would convey to the public that the United States regards scandalous images and terms as appropriate source identifiers in commerce. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
The tort Kidane alleges thus did not occur “entire[ly]” in the United States, Jerez, 775 F.3d at 24 (internal quotation marks omitted); it is a transnational tort over which we lack subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
