Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 621 - 640
of 6,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
United States In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
United States, No. 21-1279, 2022 WL 1231428 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
The federal government then sought to remove Esquivel-Quintana from the United States on the ground that his conviction constituted the “aggravated felony” of “sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
It’s a divider, not a uniter. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
It's been a full weekend at Casa CAAFlog, leaving me with insufficient time to offer a thorough analysis of United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:16 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:06 am
North Carolina, the Supreme Court of the United States seemed to emphatically agree. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:06 am
North Carolina, the Supreme Court of the United States seemed to emphatically agree. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
United States (No. 11-182), the state’s appeal of an April 2011 opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that blocked implementation of several key provisions in the law popularly known at “S.B. 1070. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Along with the previous year’s Ozawa v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
On November 20, 2007, the United States District Judge Michael J. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
United States Second Circuit, 08/02/2010 US v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the issues in the case by explaining that in 2006, the United States Congress passed, and the President signed, the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (`AWA). [read post]
