Search for: "United States v. Perry"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
(relisted after the October 12 conference) United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:42 pm
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972) (same); Black v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
The question in Perry v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
He summarised the position as follows: “It is therefore taken as a constitutional gospel in all commonwealth jurisdictions and also the United States that courts have no business handling religious questions. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
Related articles The Calls Grow Louder For Obama To Ignore Congress, And Raise The Debt Ceiling Unilaterally (businessinsider.com) United States Constitution (archives.gov) Perry V. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:39 pm
— United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 07-575 Case name: Perry v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 10:33 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
” Although Chief Judge Marshall, like Judge Vaughn Walker in the Proposition 8 litigation in California, Perry v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Perry, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:08 am
Rick Perry got hammered for his support of a state law that allowed undocumented immigrants to qualify for in-state tuition. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court case, Ridgway v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:55 am
More recently, in Van Orden v Perry [2005], a narrow conservative majority of the Supreme Court held that the display of the ten commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol did not violate the establishment clause, primarily on the basis of the historical, secular significance of the Ten Commandments in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:48 am
The most prominent challenge is Perry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:38 pm
This is a federal death penalty case, so any request for clemency -- a commutation of the death sentence to a life sentence -- would be directed to the President of the United States. [read post]
