Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina" Results 621 - 640 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm by Woodrow Pollack
In this case, the hybrid tennis court was not “used” in the United States - it was “used” in Spain and that use was broadcast in the United States.You can watch some of the match here:Decision affirmedMarcinkowska v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm by David Kopel
After the contentious tie in the 1800 presidential election between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr (one of the pro-Republican South Carolina electors was supposed to not vote for Burr, but failed to follow through), the Constitution was amended. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am by Phil Dixon
This South Carolina case involved a claims of unlawful entry and excessive force against a police officer. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Retirements -- Several Ombuds announced their retirements last year, including:Jim Augustine, University of South CarolinaPaul Kuerbis, Colorado CollegeCraig Mousin, DePaul UniversityMerle Waxman, Yale University (2022) In Memoriam -- Colleagues remembered many Ombuds, including a beloved current and upcoming Ombuds, who passed away in 2023: Mary Childers, retired inaugural Ombuds at Dartmouth CollegeJanet Eckhouse, retired Health Care Ombuds Mediator at Kaiser PermanenteCurtis Grassman,… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am by Anna Christensen
Title: State of South Carolina v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Tod M. Leaven
  His firm has offices in North and South Carolina, and his Veterans practice is national. [1] 38 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Eric Williams, George Sochan, Bowie State University  COMMENTS: Nancy Ellenberger, United States Naval Academy RED, WHITE, AND BLACK: CONSTRUCTING NINETEENTH-CENTURY RACIAL IDENTITIESPRESIDING: Amy Dru Stanley, University of Chicago Unintended Consequences: Restricting Notions of Whiteness in Maryland during the Early National Period, Patricia A. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:09 pm by Ben Vernia
* * *The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims against Wise brought under the False Claims Act by the United States in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:42 am by Amy Howe
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
Part III analyzes the emergence of the right to present a defense that a third party committed the crime and concludes with a discussion of the Supreme Court's recent decision in South Carolina v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:48 am by Gregory Forman
XVII, § 15 do not require South Carolina to recognize gay marriages from other states or countries. [read post]