Search for: "White v. Marshall"
Results 621 - 640
of 867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
DILLARD, EDWIN HENDERSON, LORENZO MCDOWELL AND SIDNEY WHITE, Appellants, vs. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm
(24) Brandon Marshall: QB or WR was the question. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
., Broadcom v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
As a career attorney in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), I worked closely with officials in the Department of Justice and the White House on congressional oversight requests and appropriate responses, including numerous questions of privilege. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Jeff Fisher attributes to him the same view expressed by Justice Byron White in 1968 that the Sixth Amendment is “reluctan[t] to entrust the plenary powers of life and liberty of the citizen to one judge or to a group of judges” (Duncan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
Former President William Howard Taft and former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall (the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court bench) also acted as the US Solicitor General.If Verrilli’s name sounds familiar to IPKat readers, it is because Verrilli (picture, left) has been one of the lead attorneys in two famous copyright battles: Grokster and Viacom v YouTube. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Major interests Because the stakes in these cases are quite large, the parties marshal support from some of the top Supreme Court advocates. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and to Chief Judge Spottswood Robinson of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am
Marshall (counterclaim brought by an estate against a creditor). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The Minnesota Twin, Harry Blackmun, who would write Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
Overhead, a warm white light appears to shine directly on the former president, casting his orange-blonde hair in a golden hue. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden to Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
In The Dutra Group v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
Bond v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:30 am
With the 60th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Brown v. [read post]
