Search for: "York v York"
Results 621 - 640
of 52,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
When the New York State Department of Financial Services sought to bar out‐of‐state lenders from extending such loans to New York residents, the plaintiffs sued for a preliminary injunction, claiming that New York’s ban violated the Indian Commerce Clause. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
Authority of the New York City's Department of Investigation to compel an individual to comply with an "investigative subpoena"Matter of Parkhouse v Stringer, 2009 NY Slip Op 05205, decided on June 25, 2009, Court of AppealsVirginia Parkhouse's testimony at a public hearing before a New York City agency prompted a complaint by a public official, followed by a subpoena to Parkhouse from the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
Last year, as part of the first wave of censorial mandatory editorial transparency laws, New York enacted N.Y. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
After an extraordinary and very unusual request by York's counsel for a 48 hour advance copy of the decision and another delay beyond the "no earlier than July 7, 2017" date, the Court announced today:2017-07-11 Ottawa Oral directions received from the Court: The Honourable Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:50 pm
Notably, however, Janssen (and New York University) previously argued in the parallel Janssen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:15 pm
Fortunately, in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:49 pm
Supreme Court decisions starting with Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 7:29 am
This concept, first discussed by the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case Brady v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:29 am
Noble v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
” [ruling in New Hope Family Services v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:31 pm
If it’s a parody of the Times, then the fake version is a fair use (after Campbell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:35 am
The Court of Appeals found warrentless entries into a home to make an arrest are "presumptively unreasonable" People v Molnar, 98 NY2d 328; Payton v New York, 445 US 573. [read post]
28 May 2021, 3:33 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained the three legal elements of standing in the case of Lujan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court decision Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am
The plaintiff in White v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 4:05 am
A v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:09 pm
The complaint (full text) in His Tabernacle Family Church, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
But not always, as the New York Court of Appeals held earlier this month in Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
