Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 9,060
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
Two Plaintiffs resided in Colorado, one Plaintiff resided in Arizona. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
” The judge cited the landmark Supreme Court decision, TVA v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:28 am
Biskupic also reflects on Justice O’Connor’s nomination and confirmation to the Supreme Court as well as relationships with each of her Supreme Court brethren. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:28 am
Third, we ask whether the FDUTPA’s fee-shifting provision applies to an action with the following procedural history: the plaintiff filed an action alleging a FDUTPA claim and prosecuted that claim for seven months; the district court ruled at summary judgment that he could not pursue the FDUTPA claim because Florida law did not apply, but allowed him to prosecute the action under Arizona’s unfair trade practices law instead; then he lost on the Arizona unfair… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:30 am
In addition, the Supreme Court, in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm
As the Arizona Supreme Court has stated in assessing such attorney admission cases, “The central component of our assessment is, all times, protection of the public.” See In re Arrotta, 208 Ariz. 509, 512 (2004). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
The California Supreme Court is no Ninth Circuit. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:15 am
More noteworthy, and more likely to be remembered in another hundred years, is this: It was on this day in 1981 that an Arizona Court of Appeals Judge named Sandra Day O’Connor was nominated by President Ronald Reagan to sit on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:38 pm
The California Supreme Court decided last week that the California Labor Code applies to the overtime claims of three nonresident instructors who performed work within the state. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:22 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:22 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
The law firm Molo Lamken has released their annual Supreme Court Business Briefing. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:16 am
In this regard, we agree with the Arizona Supreme Court's statement that “[w]hile it is clear that an insurer may defend a fairly debatable claim, all that means is that it may not defend one that is not fairly debatable. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
As I recently said, we can trace the dramatic shift in the Supreme Court’s doctrine directly to Justice Alito replacing Justice O’Connor. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:24 am
May a public financing system like the one the Supreme Court struck down in Arizona Free Enterprise as violating the First Amendment be constitutional when applied in judicial elections, on grounds that the state’s interests in regulating campaign finances in judicial elections are stronger than in legislative elections. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
The LA Times today reports that the Arizona Clean Elections Act, which the Supreme Court last week held unconstitutional, worked in practice primarily to benefit grass-roots, insurgent conservative candidates. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
At the Los Angeles Times, David Savage examines the contributions of Justice Thomas, twenty years after his Supreme Court nomination. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:43 am
By Mike Dorf In my first Verdict column, I discuss last week's Supreme Court decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC ("AFECFCP") v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am
It’ll come in handy the next time you’re sitting in a bar and someone starts playing Supreme Court Trivia. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. [read post]
