Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 6381 - 6400 of 21,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 1969), where a laparotomy pad was left in plaintiff's body during an operation, Tramutola v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Bravo to Roy McMurtry and his merry band of authors and editors who have created a body of work that is the envy of the legal publishing world in just over fifty years, and to the university presses and commercial publishers that have supported this venture, including most notably the University of Toronto Press which published three of this year’s four titles. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am
Further, the shape of the goods were designed in order to adapt to the human body and "meet the desired goal" ["Or a technical result!" [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has breathed some life into the whistleblower law, under which most cases fail because the plaintiff must satisfy narrow requirements in order to prove that she was terminated from her position for speaking out against public health and safety violations at work.The case is Webb-Weber v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:19 am by Howard Friedman
We condemn the Supreme Court’s activist decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 2:20 pm by Jani
This is what the ECJ sought to answer.The case that faced this question was Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, decided in the Summer of last year. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am by Mark Tushnet
  This textual point might be bolstered by suggesting that the Constitution creates two multi-member bodies (the House and the Senate) and assumes that each member will have rights and duties equal to those of every other member, subject only to regulations adopted by the bodies themselves (e.g, the reference to choosing a President pro tem by the Senate). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Furthermore, the Commissioner considered the decision in the University of Utah v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, where the US Federal Court determined that 'inventors' of patents are the individuals that conceived the invention, which seems to, again, not include non-human inventors. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:08 pm by Liane Fong
On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) issued a unanimous decision in John Doe v. [read post]