Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 6381 - 6400 of 8,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Ronald Mann
GE France relies generally on the deeply seated policy in favor of arbitral resolution of disputes and specifically on the Supreme Court’s holding in an earlier case, Arthur Andersen v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
A similar pattern nearly played out in Franklin County, where former clerk of court Patricia Chastain, who had been removed from office by a superior court judge, narrowly lost her bid to be elected back to the same position. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
  But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
They took the position that the statute "does not preclude States from imposing different or additional remedies, but only different or additional requirements. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Gray appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the Department of Public Safety's denial of Gray's application for a professional investigator license based on posts and comments that Gray made on social media, using an account bearing the name of his out-of-state private investigation business, concerning a Maine State Police lieutenant. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am by Andrew Frisch
In the context of an FLSA examination, however, this division of control does not help the nurses’ independent contractor argument because control of the work does not shift to the nurses, it shifts to another entity (which may thereby become a joint employer, Antenor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:57 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Some detective work in the free online Civil Calendar, based on the information provided by the news articles, does provide the docket number in the case, and also tells us that a hearing in the case of Martin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
What should be a per curiam affirmance of the Superior Court, however, could result in another act of asbestos exceptionalism by Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 7:47 am by Brad Kuhn
Based on a Court of Appeal decision published this week, Young’s Market Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Criminal Procedural Law § 210.20(g) states in pertinent part that after arraignment upon an indictment, the superior court may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such indictment or any count thereof upon the ground that the defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial. [read post]