Search for: "Does 1 to 10"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 42,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
(You can also look for other Oregonians who do write about their state's history: Oregon Authors and don't miss their Readers and Writers Groups link): 1) Patrick Foran, Adoption of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act in Oregon: The Right Time and the Right Reasons, 13 Lewis & Clark Law Review 787 (2009) 2) The Multnomah Lawyer, Nov 2009 issue (page 10) also has an article about collaborative law, by Collin McKean: "Collaborative Law: A Structured Resolution Out of… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
” A subcontract containing a clause establishing retainage between 3% and 10% would presumably be sufficient. 10. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Otherwise, counsel does not know what they do not know and could be asking for. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
According to the German Supreme Court, it is the defendant (Converse I, I ZR 52/10, at para. 30). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 10:58 am
It then immediately (and correctly) rejected both arguments of the Court of Appeal referred to above, finding them devoid of any legal merit.In accordance with Article 10(1) of the Berne Convention and the requirement that the extent of the reproduction “does not exceed that justified by the purpose” of the quotation, the abridgment, quotation or reproduction of fragments or parts of a work must be instrumental to the purpose of criticism or discussion. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:10 pm
The People responded that "the incident occurred on or about August 1, 1982 at approximately 7:10 A.M. in the vicinity of 8-10 27th Avenue, County of Queens." [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
Nick McConnell, Esq. 9:30am – 10:30am Plaintiffs breakout session: Effective witnesses, evidence and strategies your opponent does not see coming Chuck Zauzig, Esq. 9:30am – 10:30am Defense breakout session: A guide to effective independent medical examinations Nathan Zasler, MD 10:30am – 10:45am Break 10:45am – 12:00noon Current Trends in Neuroimaging Michael J. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 8:03 am
(See Part 9 of 10.) [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
The Appellant argues that the contested decision does not contain substantive grounds for the decision. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:20 pm
In claim 1 however the implementation is only implicit. [3.8]The request must be refused under A 56 EPC 1973. [4]To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In November 2018, Clovis again attempted to bring the Housing Element into compliance by adopting the RHN Overlay to provide by-right approval for multi-family housing at a density of 35 to 43 units per acre on any residentially zoned sites with a minimum of 1 acre and a maximum of 10 acres. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 5:37 am
So how does Bill C-11 address the issue? [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:54 am
Because the benefits are diffuse, political support for the policies does not match the benefit created. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:22 am
California’s law was passed at the end of September and, like the Illinois law, goes into effect on January 1, 2013. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Accordingly, the finding of the Receiving Section that the application does not enjoy a right of priority was found justified.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:55 am
Any provision in a settlement agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2019 that prevents the disclosure of the information above will be considered void as a matter of public policy. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
I assume, however, that this cost is borne by all voters. 1. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 8:14 am
Amicus Curiae Br. of ACLU-WA at 9-10. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:10 am
The constitutionality of an airport screening search, however, does not depend on consent, see Biswell, 406 U.S. at 315, and requiring that a potential passenger be allowed to revoke consent to an ongoing airport security search makes little sense in a post-9/11 world. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:52 pm
Mar. 10, 2006) (holding that stop of defendant's automobile on reasonable suspicion of transporting drug proceeds based upon corroborated information from an informant was permissible under Terry). [read post]