Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 6,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 3:13 am
Changes, additions, and deletions have clearly been made to this document, and accordingly, the court finds this document is not authentic as a matter of law.U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
For publication opinions today (2): In In the Matter of the Adoption of D.C.; H.R. v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 12:23 am
Research by the University of South Dakota's Cindy Struckman-Johnson found that 20% of prisoners reported being coerced or pressured into sex, and 10% said they were violently raped. [read post]
27 May 2008, 3:47 pm
Roberts referred the matter to the full Court. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:41 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 35 AD3d 297, said the Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was in bad faith, unlawful, or for an impermissible reason. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:33 am
[www.nylj.com]
Subscription required for online access:
APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTAdministrative LawUnclaimed Funds Office's Finder Pact Notarization Policy Was Unenforceable, Unpromulgated Rule Matter of HD Services LLC, respondent v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:54 pm
Ultimately, it probably won't matter for purposes of sentencing. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
Kelley Partners appeals the trial court's determination that Indiana had personal jurisdiction over Kelley Partners in this matter, claiming that it did not have sufficient minimum contacts with Indiana and that maintenance of the suit against it offended traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
(Let's deny the right to litigate and to appeal when it really matters)Higgings v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:15 pm
Among the questions presented in In re Bilski, the court was asked: “What standard should govern in determining whether a process is patent-eligible subject matter under section 101? [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:35 am
Not only are enemy attacks particularly bad for the organic matter inside the brain, but the constant vigilance and stress that which can occur, can create a more vulnerable brain to an "organic" injury. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
" NFP civil opinions today (11): In the Matter of O.S., J. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:43 am
As a matter of law, he concluded that they were not reasonable and therefore they were unconstitutional. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:14 am
Now, New Orleans, Louisiana is attempting to do something similar, but after the state adopted a series of "Kelo amendments" to its Constitution to prevent what at least a majority of Louisianians saw as abuse of the government's power of eminent domain, called "expropriation" in the French-based Napoleonic Code Louisiana uses for its style of government (no matter what it's… [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:18 am
Earlier this year, DA Chuck Rosenthal resigned in disgrace due to inappropriate e-mailing that involved his political campaign and non-office matters. [read post]
4 May 2008, 5:21 pm
Republicans control the governor's office -- and all statewide elected offices, for that matter -- as well as the state Senate. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:20 am
Justice Johnson wrote an opinion <a href="http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/2008/may/050882cd.pdf">concurring in part and dissenting in part</a>, which was joined by Chief Justice Jefferson and Justice Green. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
