Search for: "M. B.1." Results 6381 - 6400 of 13,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
An early commenter suggested two principles:1) The 'Angora Cat' principle of construction, which neatly explains why the same interpretation of the claim should be adopted for infringement as for novelty. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:36 am by Florian Mueller
The Android developers on the team I'm leading and I really like Android Studio (in light of Apple's Swift, Google should do even more to increase developer productivity). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
M&A parties should keep in mind Vice Chancellor Laster’s 2010 decision in Aveta v Cavallieri, which found that certain post-closing price adjustments to be determined through a stockholders’ representative were permissible under Section 251(b). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:30 am by Donna Ballman
I'm honored to announce that Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home is listed as the only employee-side blog in the Labor and Employment category, and now the voting is going on for the top blog in each category. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
  For example, the latest amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, which went into effect on December 1, 2014, appeared in the Treatise, with their first annotations, that same day. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
The requirement in INA § 286(m) that “adjudication fees” be designated “in regulations” by the Attorney General (now USCIS, since the passage of the Homeland Security Act) is satisfied by regulations found at 8 CFR § 103.7 (b)(1)(i)(C)(Biometric Fee of $85), , 8 CFR § 103.7 (b)(1)(M)(3)(Application for Advance Parole [international travel permission] fee of $360), 8 CFR § 103.7… [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:42 pm by Stephen Page
In relation to item 1 and item 2 of my concerns I could not ascertain any discrepancies between the audio and the written transcript. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
id=a5cdb7a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2014] CSOH 169 CA73/13OPINION OF LORD DOHERTY In the cause (FIRST) A LIMITED (SECOND) B LIMITED (THIRD) C LIMITED (FOURTH) D LIMITED (FIFTH) E LIMITED Pursuers;against F Defender:Pursuers:  Sandison QC, Watt;  Shepherd & WedderburnDefender:  Party Litigant27 November 2014Introduction[1]        The defender was employed by the fifth pursuer between 1… [read post]