Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 7,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
” The note then goes on to quote the decision of the Court of Appeal in Waterson Hicks v Eliopoulous, 14 November 1995 CA; Costs Law Reports (Core Volume) 363. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
The court’s opinion cited cases in the United States Supreme Court in which NALA filed an amicus brief, Missouri v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
Justice Scalia is the author of one of the two precedents that Koontz has relied upon as the core of his case, Nollan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The procedural setting of the case is complicated, but the core issue comes down to whether the Georgia courts did their job in making sure that the state prosecutor in Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:08 pm
Within its core obligations, the Fiscal Compact Treaty fails to secure basic values such as clarity and predictability. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
A state cannot control its people on the basis of negatives (e.g., we are not the United States). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:18 am
District Court for the Southern District of California in SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
See Till v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:11 pm
Beland' In Museum of Fine Arts v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
" The only case on the subject, Perry v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
But at the core, there was this core issue, does the government -- we all know that if you enter into a relationship, the government has the power to regulate it. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
., SEC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The price tag might not be great, given the state of the market, product overlap and consolidation, title renewal costs and the lack of viable competitive bidding, but the outcome, if it happened, could be impressive. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
In 2006, in eBay v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
The system was rotten to the core. [read post]
