Search for: "BES v. State" Results 6401 - 6420 of 68,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 11:30 am by Joel R. Brandes
"objects to being returned and has attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of [her] views. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:57 am by Donald Clarke
On Oct. 6, 2022, the European Court of Human Rights issued a decision, Liu v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
Nearly seven decades ago, the Supreme Court analyzed the meaning of these words: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:44 am by Betty Lupinacci
During the early 1900s (and up until 1933), states’ blue laws prohibited baseball games being played on Sundays. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
The federal district judge said CAFA does not apply because the state had filed a parens patriae action, which means it was acting in the interest it has in the well-being of its people. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:35 am
Robin Fowler of Bath & Edmonds won reversal of a Johnson County upward durational departure sentence in State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court also found that the oldest two children were of sufficient age and maturity to object to being sent back to Argentina, and that they did object. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:29 am by Zoe Read, Olswang LLP
The only outstanding issue was the level of damages being sought. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
It's been a few years since I last woke up to a significant procedural order ("signficant" as opposed to lawyers' appearances being approved) in Oracle v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:24 am by Florian Mueller
Bicks's background I now venture to guess that he will probably be the lead trial counsel.Here's the case management order: 15-07-31 Oracle v. [read post]