Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 8,649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Norton describes Rust v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
Scherl asked her doctor for a release, which he provided, stating that she was not incapacitated and did not have any work restrictions associated with her pregnancy at that time. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
The employee had claimed that the employer discriminated due to his disability when it stated it would not allow him to return to work unless he could perform his regular duties. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:13 am
As the Supreme Court most recently reiterated in Shurtleff v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
X, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 3271 (Admin) (09 December 2011) December 9, 2011 Decision of General Medical Council to refer to doctor’s severe depression in public decision was unlawful. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
Essentially, plaintiffs argued that the doctors at Westchester Medical Center failed to recognize that Theresa's problems stemmed from pancreatitis. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
The invaluable Defamation Watch blog has a post on the case of Lucire v Parmegiani [2012] NSWCA 86 entitled “No absolute privilege for Doctor complaint”. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
(Lawfare) State of Maryland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:16 am
Sweatt v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:24 am
She will be a doctoral candidate in Philosophy at NYU starting this Fall.] [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 2:23 am
Scott v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
There was extensive testimony by doctors about the lesion and its interpretation. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:34 pm
Nazon, 1991 and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:10 am
The court adopted the reasoning of Ironworkers Local Union No. 68 v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:00 am
The trial judge relied on an opinion out of the 5th Circuit, Meza v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 3:57 pm
The senator then attributed the form as a clear indication that AB 5 is nothing more than a labor organizing tool in the wake of the SCOTUS ruling in Janus v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 2:24 am
First, the question came up in the context of a competency issue from a state court proceeding in Filiaggi v. [read post]
