Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 6401 - 6420 of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  (Which is what happened a few years back in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
The facts of the case On 21 November 2023, Sir Anthony Mann of the London High Court handed down a judgment in the case of Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm by Alexa von Uexküll
The case concerns an SPC based on a second medical use/formulation patent and stems from a referral to the CJEU made by the Paris Court of Appeal with decision of 9 October 2018 in Santen v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
Peter Sherwood in Manzella v Caporuscio, 2015 NY Slip Op 31870(U)[Sup Ct NY County Oct. 6, 2015], granted summary judgment for the chef/majority member on his counterclaim against the minority member for breach of fiduciary duty and modified a prior Consent Order to authorize termination of the minority member’s employment for cause. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
In response to that statement, Peter Willby wrote an excellent article arguing that the press and Parliament need to change their focus from criticising how the courts have had to handle right to privacy issues by the use of super, hyper and possibly even-larger-still injunctions. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Schwinn discusses the Court’s denial of certiorari in Lebron v. [read post]