Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 7,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
To mitigate the effect of that violation, Canada must present a request to the United States for Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
A “covered jurisdiction” could be an entire state, or a county, city or other governmental unit at the local level. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 11:53 am
This is the case before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
This case, Ricci v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Looking inward, Citibank, AIG, and Bank of America could be thought of as instrumentalities of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
United Parcel Service, No. 08-60448 (5th Cir. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
The United States as amicus will be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Unit B Nov. 1981)). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
Shire United States, Inc., CA NO. 08-941 2009 U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Reid v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
She said she was concerned about "minors forced into polygamous situations," but of course the bigger issue arises with minors of legal marrying age who choose those relationships. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ArizonaOpinion Date: 3/27/09Cite: Sogeti USA, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:44 am
("Boston Scientific") cross-appeal, from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth' (Masson… [read post]
