Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6421 - 6440 of 9,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2011, 10:47 am by Orin Kerr
In Camreta, the Supreme Court took the rather novel view that a government official has Article III standing to challenge a lower court ruling to obtain “clearance” from the ruling so long as the official “regularly engages” in the practice that the decision regulates. [read post]
  By the Supreme Court’s definition, picketing is inherently coercive and may not be directed against a neutral employer. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:39 am by Jon Sands
Berzon argues that the state supreme court applied Strickland in a manner inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions regarding developing mitigation. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:30 am
Supreme Court made clear 132 years ago that law enforcement’s targeting of people based on their race is patently unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2023-2024update.html Three petitions for certiorari were filed: Becerra v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
  The Supreme Court has determined that the PMA process imposes federal requirements that preempt state law tort claims. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:49 am by Steve Hall
The Nebraska Supreme Court was essentially being asked to order the execution of Mr. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:03 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, March 29, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation committees, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Listing standards, Management, Risk, Say on pay, Securities regulation, Succession Corporate Employee-Engagement and Merger Outcomes Posted by Hao Liang, Singapore Management University, and Luc Renneboog, Tilburg… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:48 am by tom
Supreme Court stated in 1892 in Topliff v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:54 am
” Posted by Leeor Ofer (Harvard Law School), on Monday, September 27, 2021 Tags: Program on Corporate Governance Delaware Supreme Court Announces New Demand Futility Test Posted by William Savitt, Ryan A. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm by Bill Raftery
Alabama – Circuit Court in select counties [interim only]: No activity Alaska – Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Superior Court: No activity ArizonaSupreme Court, Court of Appeals, Superior Court in larger counties: A 2011 bill (SCR 1001) revising numerous provisions of the merit selection system (commission composition, number of names submitted, etc.) plus increasing judicial terms will… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm by cdw
The court also rejected the Ninth Circuit’s application of Arizona v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:47 pm by John Ross
The district court is not happy and imposes about $5,000 in sanctions. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Bruce Church (1970), the Supreme Court struck down an Arizona rule requiring cantaloupes that were grown in-state to be boxed in-state. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:00 am
 We Go To Trial In Municipal Court -- TwiceMy client pleaded not guilty and the case went to trial. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Michael C. Dorf
Arizona is a less hostile environment for Democrats than West Virginia. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
” All other states, he writes, reject DLOMs at the shareholder level “in both appraisal and oppression cases, either by statute or by state supreme or appellate court decisions. [read post]