Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
I’ve been away for two weeks; hence, no Plain English posts. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:39 am
Well, at least in the case of the State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:41 pm
The US Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the interesting Georgia privacy case of LFP Publishing Group v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Local groups oppose the project because its proposed location places it in the watershed of two of the state’s highest quality native trout streams and on a major bat and bird migratory route. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
Plaintiff is not a fluent English speaker, so she asked her uncle Mr. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
In addition, this case did not fall within the exceptions contained in Arts 4(2) and (3).This is believed to be the first decision in which the English court has applied Rome II since it came into effect in all EU member states (except Denmark) in January 2009. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
In addition, this case did not fall within the exceptions contained in Arts 4(2) and (3).This is believed to be the first decision in which the English court has applied Rome II since it came into effect in all EU member states (except Denmark) in January 2009. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
From: Alana Jochum, Editor-in-Chief, Cleveland State Law Review: The Cleveland State Law Review is making history as the Supreme Court hears arguments in the Second Amendment rights case of McDonald v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
Recently, the Supreme Court acting in its legislative capacity voted on January 21, 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
See: R. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:50 pm
United States (transcript) before SCOTUS. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
In Öcalan v Turkey (GC), paras 163-165, the Grand Chamber at least entertained the argument that the permission of the death penalty in Article 2 (2) of the Convention had been modified by the practice of the Contracting States since 1950. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
Nicastro v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
protection against sexual violence, established in, for example, the November 29, 2006, judgment (available in Spanish and in English) by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in La Cantuta v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
A judgment in from the European Court of Human Rights from February 9 on Richard Anderson v U.K, ruled that the absence of effective court case management in Court of Session proceedings failed to meet the right to a fair trial within the terms of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 5:46 am
v. [read post]
