Search for: "M. B.1." Results 6421 - 6440 of 13,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
No mérito, pede a inconstitucionalidade do artigo 2º, parágrafo 1º, inciso II, da Lei 6.989/97. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:32 am by PJ Blount
Delors Building, Rue Belliard 99-101, B-1040 Brussels – Belgium Registration: To access the Committee of the Regions, registration is obligatory. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Jerry Kalish
Section 209(b), Failure to furnish certain reports to participants or failure to maintain records: $11 per participant to $28 per participant. 502(m), Improper distributions: $10,000 per distribution to $15,90 per distribution. 502(c)(4), Failure to furnish automatic contribution arrangement notice under Section 514(e)(3): $1,000 per day to $1,632 per day. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:24 pm
The DA's question to the AG: "Does TYC have the authority under § 87.85(g)(3) of the Texas Administrative Code to require an offender to register as a sex offender, notwithstanding that provision conflicts with the juvenile court's authority under article 62.352(b)(1) and (c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and the juvenile court has opted to exercise its authority to defer a decision on registration? [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 12:30 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
A continuación se incluyen los mismos: Reglas básicas Nunca discuta con el oficial. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm by Michael
  ;-) “are law students really mean” - I'm saying nothing. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:28 pm
I'm not too happy with clients who do that, but it is an unfortunate fact of business life. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:43 am by Broc Romanek
Yesterday, Corp Fin issued these two new CDIs relating to Form S-4 & A/B exchanges (Exxon Capital deals) – the two new CDIs are duplicative of each other: – Securities Act Forms: Section 125. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:46 am
Thanks for reading, Jim _________________________________________ James B. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although counsel for defendant argues that “[t]he merits of Gorman’ s malpractice claims against [plaintiff] have never been determined, by this Court or by either the Referee or Justice Drager in the [m]atrimonial action” (Doc. 138 at 1), this representation is clearly false, since this Court held in its 7 /29/19 order that Justice Drager “resolved the issue of plaintiff’s alleged legal malpractice in plaintiff’s favor and determined the amount… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 8:25 am
Thanks for reading, Jim _________________________________________ James B. [read post]