Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 16,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Fahy presented oral argument in the 1st internment case to reach the Supreme Court, Hirabayashi v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:49 am
Part V. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 5:05 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
RAC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
” Bissonnette v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm
In Glatt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
Office of Ron Sims: Supreme Court reverses the LARGEST court-assessed Public Records Act penalty in Washington State history – because it was TOO SMALL: What agencies can learn Sitterson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Tort Claims Act United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:13 am
Office of Ron Sims: Supreme Court reverses the LARGEST court-assessed Public Records Act penalty in Washington State history – because it was TOO SMALL: What agencies can learn Sitterson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:29 pm
Circuit heard the case of Mozilla v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
However, only a small handful of states have humane slaughter laws that could be construed to apply to poultry birds. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:31 am
The difference between the state of the art and the claimed invention was that the prior art did not specify administration of 40 mg glatiramer acetate every other day, three times a week. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
’” Perez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
Where the issue is not the restitution of money received by the state but the provision by the state of a financial benefit (i.e. the payment of credits in relation to taxes paid to another state as in this case), the remedy has to be tailored to the wrong committed in breach of EU law. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:47 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:01 am
Silk and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
The court did not offer a rationale other than stating it would be considered "additional alimony to the wife. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:29 am
Is Second Life evolving into a public arena that must apply state and/or federal laws rules and regulations, what about the constitution? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
With its 7-2 decision in Brown v. [read post]
