Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 11,625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2013, 6:59 pm
Scientific Coordination : Jean-Sylvestre Bergé, Stéphanie Francq et Miguel Gardeñes Santiago Administrative Manager : Véronique Gervasoni, Équipe de Droit International, Européen et Comparé (EA n° 4185). [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:57 pm
He petitioned to withdraw as a counsel, first based on alleged failure to pay and then due to professed “lack of cooperation. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm
Further, at this level of inquiry, a defendant has the right to refuse to cooperate, and can walk, or even run away. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently issued a "non-precedential" Opinion in the limited tort case of Cadena v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
Elsewhere, the renaissance of the SOLO IP blog continues apace with two guest posts from Sally Cooper and one from Michael Factor -- both of whom have now joined the team togethe with another 1709 Blogger, Asim Singh. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In University of Colorado v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
In Qureshi v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:49 pm
Written by: Kimberly V. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 10:09 am
In State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:41 am
v=jfjvLK1QVvg [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:41 am
v=jfjvLK1QVvg [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
Smart v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:08 pm
Thanks to Laura Cooper (Minnesota) for sending along a note about Sweeney v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
“I want to commend the manufacturer of Joey’s Jerky for their cooperation in this investigation and the epidemiologists here at Public Health for their excellent work. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In her August 5, 2013 Opinion and Order from the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County in Riley v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In her August 5, 2013 Opinion and Order from the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County in Riley v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
(s10(4)) The listed “malware” and “spyware” functions include any of the following functions that the person who seeks express consent knows and intends will cause the computer system to operate in a manner that is contrary to the reasonable expectations of the owner or an authorized user of the computer system: (a) collecting personal information stored on the computer system; (b) interfering with the owner’s or an authorized user’s control of the computer… [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:14 am
As noted in this memo, this November, in Lawson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:19 am
Crosby v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said that with respect to the issue of attorney fees, the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal fees rendered in the course of an estate as held in Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone. [read post]
