Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
Chabot, 531 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
McCarthur, 6 F.3d 1270, 1276 (7th Cir. 1993)). [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Logan 250 F.3d 350 (6th Cir. 2001) and then Wiggins v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
., ___ F.3d ___, 2013 U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:11 am
Evon has a better shot if the government agrees with a below minimum sentence and 18 USC § 3553(f), allows the government to request safety valve treatment. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
In response, however, Chief Judge Michael F. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:26 am
” Instead, she argued that she was a “foreseeable plaintiff,” but the Court ruled that “[f]oreseeability, while a factor in every negligence case, is not one of the valid special duty exceptions. [read post]
13 May 2007, 8:49 am
Police used a ruse to get defendant to mail them an envelope so he would lick the envelope and leave DNA. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:34 am
Vinton, supra, 594 F.3d at p. 25; ...) [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.3d 387, 390 (7th Cir.2010). [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
’” 871 F.3d at 1362. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
The biggest problem I have with the DoJ/USPTO paper is this passage:"For example, if a putative licensee refuses to pay what has been determined to be a F/RAND royalty, or refuses to engage in a negotiation to determine F/RAND terms, an exclusion order could be appropriate. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
Morris, 448 F.3d 929 (6th Cir. 2006), the District Court sentenced a patent recidivist drug dealer, stating: “It's the sentence of the Court that the defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for 57 months, which if I follow the guidelines, is the lower end of the guidelines. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:21 am
During discovery, Plaintiff sent one defendant 58 requests for production “seeking millions of pages of paper and electronic documents. [read post]
3 May 2018, 10:40 am
ProPride, Inc., 579 F.3d 603, 610 (6th Cir. 2009) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss where the defendant did not use the trademark to identify the source of its products or to suggest an association between the defendant and the plaintiff); Cummings v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
, 873 F.2d 576, 584–85 (2d Cir. 1989). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Barry, 144 F.3d 847, 853 (D.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:56 am
Now, says the defendant, hold on, friend-o. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm
Co., 32 F.3d 851, 863 (3d Cir. 1994). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:49 pm
Zimmerman, 509 F.3d 920, 927 (8th Cir. 2007). [read post]
