Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 40,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 1:15 am
We know that the clients in these kind of cases have an excess of bile and resentment and those emotions will come down on heads - even if we meet our client's stated goals.Better, for its rarity (although not as rare as the ivory-billed woodpecker) is the client who is happy enough with the result to thank us for the job done.Few cases deserve a Carthaginian peace. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:38 pm
According to the Solicitor General, that court struck down portions of a similar law in Healthcare Association of New York State, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
United States, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
See State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:22 am
Opinion: Case C-332/11, ProRail NV v Xpedys NV – the Regulation does not preclude a Member State court, acting under its own procedural rules, from ordering the taking of expert evidence, partly in another Member State, provided that the performance of that part of the investigation does not require the cooperation of the authorities of that Member State. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:15 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:18 am
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In State v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:03 am
US v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
In its decision, the Court struck down a federal statute that effectively limited sports betting to a single state, Nevada. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Greenlaw v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:32 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
Neal really breaks down. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 8:55 am
Case citation: Kimbrell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
Prematurely, it turns out; last year the 4th District reversed the grant of the suppression in State v. [read post]
