Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Kohler, Special Rules for State-owned Companies in European Civil Procedure? [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
As an example, she referred to the English case of Marinos v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
The POL, an English and Welsh firm, is a big business with 17,000 branches. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
The POL, an English and Welsh firm, is a big business with 17,000 branches. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am
[I will note that an interventionist state could decide to rely on what you were persuaded to do as a distinguishing fact, though that has a bad history.] [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Those Progressives saw the administrative state as the sword of social justice, particularly in the New Deal era. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The FCA has stated that serious breaches will be prioritised and that it will act “swiftly and assertively” where necessary. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
English common law, on the other hand, has not yet elaborated the role of fundamental rights, protected by the ECHR and given effect through the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
However, English law does not allow litigants to bring claims in multiple fora. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:39 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
—Danielle Steel 1Franatovich v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
Social studies and English teachers are watching Wolf Hall on PBS. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
