Search for: "In Re SMITH " Results 6441 - 6460 of 9,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2012, 6:50 am by KC Johnson
Only when the case moved to a judge—Osmond Smith—who didn’t have to fear the electorate that nominated and elected Mike Nifong (and would subsequently elect his chief assistant) did we see fair rulings from the bench.The job of judges should be to uphold the law, and the state and federal constitutions, even when doing so (as occurred with Judge Smith’s actions) runs against majority opinion. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:15 am by Rachel Sandler
Cir. 1993). [6] MPEP § 2137.01 (quoting In re Hardee, 223 U.S.P.Q. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Lee E. Berlik
” If you use a real person’s actual name (say, “John Smith”), you may inadvertently give the business grounds to argue in court that, because it has no record of any actual customer named John Smith, the review is fraudulent and that it needs to subpoena your ISP to uncover your true identity. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:24 am by Steven Berk
  Second, she must immediately pay taxes but we’re not going to even factor that in. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The drive to use religious liberty as a mechanism for control was so strong, however, RFRA was re-enacted in 2000. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:31 am by SHG
This was all about “sexual assault,” but the recent outing of facts by Ben Smith broke the omerta of MeToo by describing what actually happened. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith, 294 U.S. 20, 22 (1935); J.E.M. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
The headline grabber for the week is the opinion in In re: Sealed Case, which revealed that Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed Twitter’s records related to Donald Trump’s Twitter account. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Contact Arnold & Smith, PLLC for a free consultation, call at 704-370-2828 or click here for additional resources. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:42 am by admin
Law school and life – they’re not always fair. [read post]